Talk:Naruto vs Sora/@comment-35555638-20190122080438/@comment-27518422-20190122153332

Does it matter if he was the first person to create that battle? If he made a different result it doesn't mean anything other than Zack wanted to make the winner win. That's all there is to it. Thing is, your fights (or some of them on OMM) were spite. You spited Dark Pit vs Wario. Because you and Hipper were both being quite nasty to me about the Death Battle so you made an OMM where Dark Pit got stomped.

Regardless, here's the thing: Wins and Losses are irrelevant. But even if they were important, ''Sora has a positive Wins/Losses Record. ''Some spite, right? Yes, Zack has made battles that were made on other sites, but he has not made these battles to spite those users. No offence to anyone, but it is hard to make a completely original match any more.

Mario vs Goku is a battle Zack has done twice, and is quite a popular one thanks to the popularity of both characters. Carol vs Tails is a thematically logical battle. Tails tends to win most times because he is the more popular character. Zack made Carol win simply because he wanted to make Carol win. That's it. No issue. If Zack was going to spite, he would go about it the way other users on this site have done. But that's just not who Zack is.

So can we please stop with this "Needs to lose/ Wins too much/Finally wins" BS? It makes a lot of writers feel pressurised, and I dare say bullied into making a battle go someone else's way.